SCOTUS Nomination Reform
*(Congressional Pool → Presidential Narrowing → Senate Confirmation → People’s Assembly Selection → National Failsafe Vote)*
The Papers library contains reform proposals organized by topic. Each paper includes a summary, key takeaways, implementation details, sources, and version history. Use the filters below to explore papers by topic, status, or search for specific content.
*(Congressional Pool → Presidential Narrowing → Senate Confirmation → People’s Assembly Selection → National Failsafe Vote)*
The United States Supreme Court is one of the most powerful judicial bodies in the world, yet it remains frozen in a 19th-century framework. With only nine justices serving on a single bench, the Court hears fewer than one percent of petitions each year, leaving most constitutional questions unanswered. At the same time, public trust in the Court has eroded due to hyper-political nomination battles, ethical controversies, and inconsistent accountability.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and the federal judiciary hold extraordinary power over the nation’s laws and liberties. Yet unlike every other branch of government, SCOTUS justices and federal judges lack a binding, enforceable code of ethics and remain insulated from meaningful accountability. This reform establishes: 1. A Binding Judicial Ethics Code — clear standards of conduct for all federal judges, including Supreme Court justices.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) and the federal judiciary hold extraordinary power over the nation’s laws and liberties. Yet unlike every other branch of government, SCOTUS justices and federal judges lack a binding, enforceable code of ethics and remain insulated from meaningful accountability. This reform establishes: 1. A Binding Judicial Ethics Code — clear standards of conduct for all federal judges, including Supreme Court justices.